| |
CME Grand Rounds for Oncologists, Surgeons
and
Ear, Nose and Throat Surgeons
Community Oncology Clinical
Debates in Head and Neck Cancer
Click here to request this program for your organization.
Target Audience
This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of
community- and academic-based medical and radiation oncologists
and ear, nose, and throat surgeons.
Purpose
To educate oncologists and surgeons on clinical debates arising
from recent advances in surgical techniques and multimodality
treatments for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head
and neck (SCCHN).
Program Overview
The treatment of patients with SCCHN is complex and requires a
multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
Although treatment varies based on tumor size, stage, and patient
performance status, the ultimate goals of treatment remain the
same: improved survival outcomes, organ function preservation, and
improved quality of life. Despite advances in surgical techniques,
and the availability of new multimodality treatments, considerable
clinical debates remain regarding optimal treatment choices.
This academic- and community-based grand rounds series will
focus on the most pivotal debates, including concurrent versus
sequential chemoradiotherapy, biologic therapy, surgery, radiation,
and the collaborative delivery of quality care. The resolution of these
clinical debates will greatly influence the treatment of SCCHN in
2009 and beyond. Thought leader faculty will provide an overview of
clinical debates, followed by one or more case studies to stimulate
interdisciplinary discussion.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this program, participants should be better able to:
- Describe recent clinical data on patient selection for sequential versus concurrent chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy, including how to select patients for different pathways of therapy
- Describe which surgical techniques and systemic regimens are appropriate post-chemoradiotherapy
- Identify appropriate drug sequencing and the continuation of agents following disease progression
- Explain recent data on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and their combination with chemoradiotherapy
- Outline an approach to multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve optimal patient outcomes
- Describe the role of interdisciplinary functional assessment in optimizing outcomes
Program Agenda
- Program Overview (5 mins)
- Overview of Interdisciplinary Debates (25 mins)
- Case study: For treatment with curative intent, who should receive sequential chemotherapy? Chemoradiotherapy? What prognostic factors can be applied when making treatment decisions?
- What is the role of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for treatment with curative intent?
- Should patients with human papillomavirus be treated differently? Should these patients be stratified in future clinical trials?
- Case study: What is the role of minimally invasive head and neck surgery in the 21st century?
- Role of neck dissection post chemoradiation: Who, when, and how extensive Interdisciplinary
- Discussion of Debates and Case Studies
(30 mins)
Jointly sponsored by:
This activity is supported by an independent educational grant from
sanofi-aventis U.S. |
|
|
Select Other Community Oncology Clinical Debates
Additional CME Meetings on This Topic
Faculty
Marshall R. Posner, MD
(Co-Chairman)
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Ezra E.W. Cohen, MD
University of Chicago
Medical Center
Robert I. Haddad, MD
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
John A. Ridge, MD, PhD, FACS
Fox Chase Cancer Center |
Floyd Christopher Holsinger, MD, FACS
(Co-Chairman)
University of Texas M. D.
Anderson
Cancer Center
A. Dimitrios Colevas, MD
Stanford University
Medical Center
Wayne M. Koch, MD
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive
Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
|
Accreditation Statement
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of Postgraduate Institute for Medicine (PIM) and Institute for Medical Education & Research (IMER). PIM is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Credit Designation
Postgraduate Institute for Medicine designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
A statement of credit will be issued only upon receipt of a completed activity evaluation form.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Postgraduate Institute for Medicine (PIM) assesses conflict of interest with its
instructors, planners, managers, and other individuals who are in a position to
control the content of CME activities. All relevant conflicts of interest that are
identified are thoroughly vetted by PIM for fair balance, scientific objectivity of
studies utilized in this activity, and patient care recommendations. PIM is committed
to providing its learners with high quality CME activities and related
materials that promote improvements or quality in healthcare and not a specific
proprietary business interest of a commercial interest.
|
| ``` |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|