Cardiotoxicity in Primary Breast Cancer: Expert Responses to Frequently Asked Questions

This program was originally presented as an educational symposium during the ONS 33rd Annual Congress.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008
6:30 pm – 8:30 pm (EST)

Philadelphia Marriott
Grand Ballroom Salons G, K, & L
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Release Date: August 2008
Expiration Date: August 2009
Estimated Time to Complete Activity: 111 Minutes (Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Acrobat Reader required)

I have read and understand the information presented on this page and agree to proceed with the educational activity.

Target Audience

This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of patient care oncology nurses and related healthcare professionals.

Purpose

To address questions from oncology nurses regarding the treatment of primary breast cancer.

Program Overview

Anthracyclines, taxanes, and HER2 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of primary breast cancer. While disease-free and overall survival rates have improved dramatically over the past several years, management of side effects remains a critical issue. The Institute for Medical Education & Research (IMER) has developed several educational initiatives on breast cancer focusing on treatment-related side effects, including cardiotoxicity. During this interactive, 2-hour educational program, oncology and cardiology expert faculty will answer frequently asked questions regarding cardiotoxicity compiled from oncology nurse submissions at various IMER-sponsored educational symposia on breast cancer. Additional questions and real-life patient challenges submitted by oncology nurses in the months leading up to the symposium will be included.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this program, participants should be better able to:

  • Describe the clinical benefits of anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors in primary breast cancer
  • Distinguish the pathophysiologic mechanisms of cardiotoxicity associated with anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors
  • Identify the relative risks of cardiac dysfunction associated with anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors in primary breast cancer
  • Discuss the evolving role of nonanthracycline regimens in primary breast cancer
  • Develop a clinical algorithm for monitoring cardiac function in patients with primary breast cancer receiving cardiotoxic regimens
  • Outline appropriate patient education related to cardiac side effects of primary breast cancer therapy

Disclosure of Unlabeled Use

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. IMER and sanofi-aventis U.S. do not recommend the use of any agent outside of the labeled indications.

The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of IMER and sanofi-aventis U.S. Please refer to the official prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indications, contraindications, and warnings.

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

IMER requires instructors, planners, managers, and other individuals who are in a position to control the content of this activity to disclose any real or apparent conflict of interest they may have as related to the content of this activity. All identified conflicts of interest are thoroughly vetted by IMER for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies mentioned in the materials or used as the basis for content, and appropriateness of patient care recommendations.

The faculty reported the following financial relationships or relationships to products or devices they or their spouse/life partner have with commercial interests related to the content of this educational activity:

Please refer to the individual faculty bios for statements.

The planners and managers reported the following financial relationships or relationships to products or devices they or their spouse/life partner have with commercial interests related to the content of this educational activity:

Madelyn T. Herzfeld, RN, BSN, OCN®, reported no areas of conflict.

Dorothy Dulko, PhD, RN, AOCNP®, reported no areas of conflict.

Michael Bramwell reported no areas of conflict.

Davecia Ragoonath, MS, reported no areas of conflict.

Disclaimer

Participants have an implied responsibility to use the newly acquired information to enhance patient outcomes and their own professional development. The information presented in this activity is not meant to serve as a guideline for patient management. Any procedures, medications, or other courses of diagnosis or treatment discussed or suggested in this activity should not be used by clinicians without evaluation of their patients’ conditions and possible contraindications on dangers in use, review of any applicable manufacturer’s product information, and comparison with recommendations of other authorities.

 

 

 

Sponsored by:

Faculty

Maureen Major Campos, RN, MS (Chairperson)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Bio
  • Abstract

Ms. Major Campos is a clinical nurse specialist in medical oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. She received her master's degree in nursing from Columbia University in New York City. She works in a collaborative practice model managing patients receiving medical care for breast cancer. Her practice is focused on symptom management, patient education, triage, and protocol coordination. Ms. Major Campos is viewed as a clinical expert and lectures extensively on breast cancer patient care.

Maureen Major Campos, RN, MS, reported a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of: Speakers’ Bureau, Genentech BioOncology, Abraxis Oncology, and Amgen, Inc.

Case Discussions Based on Oncology Nurse Submissions

Improvements in adjuvant therapy will continue to prolong overall survival in women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. Nurses have an opportunity to educate this patient population regarding clinical trial data and therefore influence adherence to therapy. A nursing assessment at each treatment infusion can also influence appropriate management of a patient with declining cardiac function. A significant emphasis has been placed on survivorship in this patient population as science continues to advance its understanding of the patterns of breast cancer growth. Quality of life studies are needed to further understand the impact of adjuvant treatment on the healthy population of patients who undergo adjuvant treatment.

Breast Cancer Survivorship Pyschological Support Update

In recent years, cancer survivorship issues have received greater attention and research interest as the number of cancer survivors increases in the United States, and the cancer advocacy movement gains in strength. Cancer survivorship is defined as a continuum from the time of diagnosis to the end of life. It has been conceptualized as a progression through three phases or “seasons” of survival incorporating: (1) surviving the treatment and its side effects, (2) beginning to return to normal life while being monitored for recurrence, and (3) long-term adjustment, when the cancer experience is viewed as an episode in a full life. In 2004, the most recent year with complete Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, there were 10.1 million cancer survivors; of these, more than 2.4 million were breast cancer survivors. Family members, friends, and caregivers of the woman diagnosed with breast cancer are also considered to be cancer survivors.

Psychosocial distress, at varying levels of severity, accompanies the cancer experience. There are calls to consider distress the sixth vital sign; it would then be routinely monitored along with pulse, blood pressure, respiration, temperature, and pain. Periods of highest distress for the woman with breast cancer are associated with transition points in treatment. Completion of treatment may be a cause of increased anxiety rather than joy. There are many potential barriers to meeting the psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer after active treatments ends. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies has released several reports during recent years describing strategies to acknowledge and meet these needs, declaring that provision of psychosocial services should be a standard of care for survivors of cancer. Oncology nurses play a key role in assessing the patient, family members, and caregivers for signs of distress. In so doing, an atmosphere of compassion and trust is created such that the breast cancer survivor feels free to share psychosocial concerns and have them addressed by appropriate specialists if necessary.

Michael S. Ewer, MD
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Bio
  • Abstract

Dr. Ewer is a professor of medicine at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. He received his doctor of medicine from the University of Basel Medical Faculty, Switzerland, and received his doctor of jurisprudence from the University of Houston Law Center. His special interests include cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments, medical ethics, and patients’ rights. He has written more than 200 publications and lectures frequently throughout the United States, Europe, and Asia.

Michael Ewer, MD, reported a financial interest/relationship of affiliation in the form of: Consultant, Roche Laboratories, Inc., sanofi-aventis U.S., and Genentech BioOncology; Speakers' Bureaus, Roche Laboratories, Inc., sanofi-aventis U.S., and Genentech BioOncology..

Anthracyclines and HER2 Inhibitors: Benefits vs. Risks

Myocardial dysfunction is the most commonly discussed manifestation of cardiotoxicity associated with cancer therapy, however, other equally troubling effects include ischemia, dysrhythmia, and pericardial toxicities. It is now recognized that therapeutic agents, particularly the anthracyclines, may cause myocyte damage and death. This form of damage, referred to as Type I chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CRCD), has characteristic ultrastructural properties. Despite substantial loss of myocytes, the heart, as an organ with considerable reserves, often compensates and does not exhibit clinical evidence of damage unless additional factors or toxicities cause sequential cardiac stress, further cell damage, and ultimately, clinically recognizable dysfunction.

Other agents, most notably trastuzumab, cause a temporary loss of contractile function, but with a much lower propensity for progressing to cell death. In isolated state, cardiac dysfunction resulting from these agents, now referred to as Type II CRCD, typically recovers to near baseline levels. However, as many patients are treated with a Type I CRCD-causing agent followed by a Type II agent, the first may result in a subclinical injury that surfaces as a result of the additive dysfunction caused by a subsequent insult. Because both Type I and Type II CRCD-causing agents lead to decreased cardiac contractility, their relative contributions to cardiac dysfunction cannot be determined using available clinical tools.We are only now beginning to understand these interactions and develop strategies for the proper screening, monitoring, surveillance, and treatment of cardiac dysfunction associated with cancer therapy.

Update on Clinical Trials of Antiangiogenesis Agents in Breast Cancer/Metastatic Breast Cancer Treatment Update

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains a largely incurable disease. However, survival rates continue to increase as advances in the understanding of the biology of tumorigenesis are made. Angiogenesis plays a major role in tumor formation and therefore, agents targeting this process, including the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, are particularly successful at treating tumors. In addition, the introduction of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has dramatically improved outcomes for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive MBC and reaffirmed the value of targeting specific cellular proteins as a means of controlling disease. This has led to the development of a plethora of new agents for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the metastatic setting, though optimal chemotherapy regimens are still under investigation.

Sharon Giordano, MD
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • Bio
  • Abstract

Dr. Giordano is an assistant professor in the Department of Breast Medical Oncology at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. She also serves as a vice-chairperson on M. D. Anderson’s Institutional Review Board. She received her doctor of medicine from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, and completed her fellowship at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Giordano’s research interests include breast cancer in the elderly, breast cancer outcomes, and male breast cancer. She is an active member of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Association for Cancer Research.

Sharon Giordano, MD, MPH, reported a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in the form of: Speakers' Bureau, Roche Laboratories, Inc.

Anthracyclines and HER2 Inhibitors: Benefits vs. Risks

Anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors (eg, trastuzumab) are among the most important agents in the treatment of breast cancer. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy improves survival of patients with early stage breast cancer; the new nonanthracycline regimen of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide has also proved effective. In addition, trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against HER2, improves overall survival of patients with HER2-positive early stage breast cancer as well as metastatic breast cancer; it is associated with a 40% to 50% reduction in risk of death from breast cancer. Despite their efficacy, anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors also carry a risk of cardiac dysfunction. Patients treated with anthracyclines are at an increased risk of developing congestive heart failure, particularly with increasing cumulative dose. In addition, older patients, those who have preexisting cardiac disease, or patients treated concurrently with anthracyclines and HER2 inhibitors, may be at an even greater risk. It is therefore crucial that patients are monitored closely for signs of cardiac impairment in order to minimize the risks without compromising the level of benefit derived.

 

 

Accreditation Statements

This educational activity for 1.85 contact hours will be provided by the Institute for Medical Education & Research (IMER). IMER is an approved provider of continuing education by the Georgia Nurses Association, an accredited approver by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.

A statement of credit will be issued only upon receipt of a completed activity evaluation form.

Safeguards Against Commercial Bias

IMER affirms that the content and format of its CE activities and related materials promote improvements and quality in healthcare and do not promote a specific proprietary business interest of a commercial entity. To this end, IMER employs several strategies to ensure the absence of commercial bias, including but not limited to review of all planned content for CE activities sponsored by IMER to ensure adherence to the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s criteria and operational requirements and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education’s content validation statements and resolution of any actual or perceived conflict of interest that exist. We employ three metrics as we review materials:

1. Fair balance

a. Recommendations or emphasis must fairly represent and be based on
    a reasonable and valid interpretation of the information available on     the subject matter

b. No single product or service is overrepresented when other equal     competing products or services are available for inclusion

2. Scientific objectivity of studies mentioned in the materials or used as the basis for     content

3. Appropriateness of patient care recommendations made to learners

Privacy Policy

When you participate in an educational activity provided by the Institute for Medical Education & Research (“IMER” or “we”), we ask you for your name, degree, affiliation, street address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address (the “Information”). We use that Information in the following ways:

We use the Information to grade your posttest and to send you a certificate of completion of the educational activity. If we use a third-party company to grade your posttest and issue certificates of completion, we will give the Information to that company for that purpose only.

For each educational activity that you take, you must complete an evaluation questionnaire. That questionnaire asks if you are willing to participate in a follow-up survey. If you answer yes, we will use your name and contact information to send you the survey.

We may use the Information to invite you to participate in other educational activities that IMER or its affiliates may offer.

On occasion, the commercial supporter of a educational activity will ask us for a list of the people who participated in that activity, so that it may document the first level of outcomes-based evaluation in the educational activity (ie, who attended, which medical specialties/practices were represented, how this compares to the target audience, and whether the activity needs to be repeated because significant numbers of the target audience did not attend). In that event, we will provide the supporter with your name, title and affiliation, but we will request in writing that the supporter not contact you directly for any purpose.

If our company is acquired or merged into another company, we may make the Information available to the new owner/entity to use in the ways described above, to enable it to continue our business.

Any changes to our privacy policy will be posted here.

Method of Participation

There are no fees for participating and receiving nursing contact hours for this activity.

Participants must complete the postest by recording the best answer to each question. Once you finished your test and completed the subsequent evaluation form, click submit test to send your responsed to us. Your test will be immediately reviewed and if you receive a passing grade of 70% or better, you will then be directed to print your certificate online.

Media

Web site